A growing dispute over political zoning is opening a new front in Migori County’s preparations for the 2027 General Election, with leaders from the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) and the United Democratic Alliance (UDA) warning that pre-arranged political deals could undermine voters’ freedom to choose their representatives.
At the centre of the debate is Dr Pamela Odhiambo, the former Migori Woman Representative and UDA gubernatorial aspirant, who has criticised proposals to reserve elective seats for particular parties or political camps.
Pamela argues that such arrangements risk restricting democratic competition, discouraging voters and deepening divisions at a time when political alliances in the wider Nyanza region are undergoing significant changes.
Her position places her among the political figures challenging the idea that party strongholds should automatically determine who contests or occupies elective offices.
The debate gained prominence in April 2026, when The Standard reported that a section of ODM and UDA grassroots leaders in Migori had opposed zoning, arguing that voters should retain the freedom to select candidates across party lines.
The disagreement comes as political parties and aspirants intensify preparations for the 2027 elections, with the governorship, parliamentary seats and ward representation expected to attract competing ambitions.
For Migori, the question is particularly sensitive because ODM has historically enjoyed a substantial following in the county, while UDA-linked politicians are seeking to expand their political presence.
The emerging debate is therefore not simply about which party should field candidates in particular areas. It also concerns the balance between party negotiations and the constitutional principle that electoral choices ultimately belong to voters.
Pamela challenges the logic of zoning
Pamela has framed her opposition to zoning around the need for open competition and meaningful representation.
Speaking during the debate reported by The Standard, she warned that predetermined political arrangements could deny residents the opportunity to choose leaders on the basis of their records, policies and ability to deliver development.
She argued that the practice of presenting voters with candidates selected through political agreements could contribute to voter apathy, particularly where residents feel that their choices have already been restricted.
Her intervention is significant because she is pursuing the Migori governorship under UDA after previously serving as Woman Representative between 2017 and 2022.
Having sought the gubernatorial seat through ODM in 2022 before moving towards UDA, Pamela now finds herself in a political camp that could be disadvantaged if informal or formal zoning arrangements limit competition in areas traditionally associated with ODM.
Her position also aligns with UDA aspirants who want the party to maintain room for candidates seeking different elective positions in the county.
However, opposition to zoning does not necessarily mean that all aspirants within the same party will agree on nominations or campaign strategy. Open competition can produce its own disputes, particularly when several candidates seek the same ticket.
The challenge for political parties will be to establish fair nomination procedures while managing the ambitions of competing candidates and maintaining internal cohesion.
ODM grassroots leaders also raise concerns
The opposition to zoning is not confined to UDA.
Evans Ogutu, the ODM chairman in Uriri, also questioned the wisdom of restricting political competition in areas where the party enjoys a strong grassroots presence.
According to The Standard’s report, Ogutu argued that ODM should not fear competition from other parties if it remains confident in its support among voters.
His position reflects a strand of opinion within the party that believes electoral strength should be demonstrated at the ballot rather than protected through arrangements that limit the field of candidates.
The argument raises an important question for ODM as it navigates its relationship with UDA ahead of 2027: can the party preserve its political influence while accommodating agreements intended to manage competition between allied political formations?
For grassroots officials, the answer may depend on whether such arrangements strengthen party organisation or leave local aspirants and their supporters feeling excluded.
The report also quoted Nyatike parliamentary aspirant Odiso Ogenga, who accused ODM of seeking to sideline UDA aspirants through zoning.
That allegation represents the position of a political aspirant and should not be treated as an established finding about the party’s intentions.
The competing statements nevertheless demonstrate the level of sensitivity surrounding political negotiations and the distribution of opportunities to contest elective seats.
The wider UDA-ODM political equation
Migori’s zoning debate is unfolding against the backdrop of broader political realignments in Nyanza.
Following the death of former Prime Minister Raila Odinga in October 2025, questions about ODM’s future direction, leadership and relationship with President William Ruto’s administration have become increasingly prominent.
Some leaders have advocated cooperation with the ruling party, while others have emphasised the need to protect ODM’s identity, negotiating position and grassroots support.
The debate over zoning has become one of the points where those interests intersect.
Political agreements between parties can be used to coordinate campaigns, reduce competition between allied candidates and establish common objectives.
But when such arrangements are perceived to restrict voters’ choices or exclude aspirants without transparent procedures, they can generate resistance.
In September 2026, The media divisions among Nyanza leaders over whether support for Ruto’s re-election should be unconditional or tied to political and development commitments.
The report highlighted differences over power-sharing proposals and the terms of cooperation between ODM and UDA.
Those divisions provide important context for understanding why the zoning question matters in Migori. A broader political understanding between parties does not automatically resolve local disputes over who should contest particular seats.
Local aspirants have their own constituencies, ambitions and political calculations. Their willingness to accept a negotiated arrangement may depend on whether they believe it offers a fair opportunity to participate in the electoral process.
What the dispute means for the governor’s race
The governorship is one of the most consequential contests in Migori, with political competition expected to focus on development priorities, public service delivery and the performance of county institutions.
Pamela’s opposition to zoning comes as she seeks to establish herself as a contender under UDA. Her position gives her an opportunity to frame the contest around voter choice and the right of aspirants to present alternative leadership agendas.
But the wider political test will be whether the principle of open competition is applied consistently, including within UDA itself.
If several candidates seek the party’s gubernatorial ticket, the party will need a transparent nomination process capable of managing disagreements without undermining its organisation.
Similarly, ODM will have to determine how it balances its grassroots structures and electoral ambitions with any negotiations involving other political parties.
For voters, the key question is whether the eventual process allows them to assess competing candidates on their qualifications, records, policy proposals and capacity to address county challenges.
The zoning dispute does not, by itself, establish which aspirant has greater public support. Nor does opposition to zoning guarantee that every candidate will secure a party ticket or win an election.
It does, however, expose a central tension in Migori’s political preparations: the desire of party leaders to coordinate their interests versus the expectation that elections should provide genuine choices.
Democracy beyond party agreements
Kenya’s constitutional framework provides for regular elections and protects citizens’ political rights, including the right to participate in political activities and to choose their representatives.
Political parties remain important vehicles for organising candidates and presenting policy programmes. They may also negotiate alliances, subject to the law and their internal rules.
Yet party agreements cannot replace the legal processes governing nominations and elections, nor can they determine the final will of voters at the ballot.
The debate in Migori therefore presents an opportunity for parties to explain how their proposed alliances and nomination arrangements will operate, how aspirants will be treated and how disputes will be resolved.
Transparency will be especially important where local candidates believe that negotiations conducted by senior leaders could affect their political futures.
For residents, meaningful participation goes beyond being asked to endorse a political alliance. It includes the ability to scrutinise candidates, compare policy proposals and make electoral choices without undue pressure.
The road to 2027
With the next General Election approaching, the dispute over zoning is likely to remain part of Migori’s political conversation as aspirants organise supporters and parties refine their strategies.
Pamela and other opponents of zoning have made their position clear: electoral competition should remain open, and voters should determine who represents them.
Within ODM, the views expressed by Ogutu indicate that opposition to restrictive arrangements also exists among some party grassroots leaders.
The competing positions leave political parties with the task of balancing coalition negotiations, internal democracy and local political realities.
Ultimately, the debate will be settled not by public declarations alone but by the rules adopted by parties, the conduct of nominations and the choices voters make when they cast their ballots.
For Migori residents, the central issue remains whether the 2027 contest will offer a meaningful range of candidates and ideas on the county’s future—or whether political negotiations will narrow the choices available before voters enter the polling station.
About The Author
