The political temperature in Migori County is steadily rising long before the official campaign season begins. Funeral gatherings, church pulpits and roadside rallies have become ideological battlegrounds where satire, clan identity, historical memory and political insults are increasingly replacing sober policy debate. Beneath the humour and theatrics lies a deeper concern: the gradual transformation of politics into performance while governance itself fades into the background.
Politics in Migori County has always been emotional, colourful and deeply rooted in community identity. From the days of negotiated democracy to the current era of devolution, political competition in the county has rarely lacked drama.
Yet what is emerging ahead of the 2027 general election is not merely spirited political contestation; it is a dangerous descent into ethnic symbolism, personality cults, funeral populism and rhetorical warfare that risks distracting residents from the urgent developmental needs confronting the county.
The recent political commentaries and exchanges circulating across Migori’s social and political spaces reveal a county increasingly consumed by insults, coded language, historical stereotypes and public mockery disguised as political mobilisation.
Leaders and their supporters are no longer simply competing over manifestos or development records. They are weaponising culture, clan affiliations, folklore and historical memories to define political enemies and consolidate support bases.
One particularly revealing narrative recalls the infamous era during former President Daniel arap Moi’s administration when young women from Ukambani were allegedly transported to Luo Nyanza during periods of severe drought in exchange for food and money.
The story, narrated with humour and nostalgia, paints a vivid picture of desperate young men flocking to Rabuor hoping to marry the “Wakamba women” reportedly brought by the government.
At face value, the anecdote appears comedic and harmless, a nostalgic recollection of youthful desperation and rural social life. But beneath the humour lies something troubling.
The story exposes how communities historically viewed women as transactional objects during moments of economic hardship. It also reflects the deeply patriarchal mentality that measured marriage not as partnership but as acquisition.
More importantly, the resurrection of such stories in today’s political discourse demonstrates how historical stereotypes continue to shape modern political rhetoric.
In contemporary Migori politics, humour is no longer innocent entertainment. It has become a sophisticated political weapon.
Governor Ochillo Ayacko and Uriri MP Mark Nyamita have emerged as the dominant figures in the looming 2027 gubernatorial contest. Their rivalry now defines much of the county’s political atmosphere.
While Ayacko projects himself as the experienced statesman and rightful political heir of Migori leadership, Nyamita has built his campaign around ridicule, populist messaging and aggressive accountability narratives.
The language employed by both camps reflects a worrying trend in Kenyan politics where leaders deliberately reduce governance to theatre. Ayacko’s adoption of grandiose titles such as “Ruoth,” “Nyakwar Jamoko,” “Chiel Wiye Okee and “Wuon Mandate” mirrors the classic tendencies of political strongmen who construct personality cults around themselves.
Such self-glorification may energise loyal supporters, but it also creates an environment where criticism is interpreted as betrayal and governance becomes secondary to political image-making.
On the other hand, Nyamita’s branding of the governor as “Oyundi (lazy hummingbird),” a folkloric bird associated with laziness and opportunism in Luo oral traditions, may appear politically clever, but it equally contributes to the erosion of issue-based politics.
Political wit can be entertaining, but when slogans become substitutes for policy, democracy itself suffers.
Sadly, Migori is not alone in this trajectory.
Across Kenya, funerals and church services are increasingly turning into political arenas where leaders exchange insults before grieving families and worshippers. Sacred spaces meant for reflection, mourning and spiritual healing are now routinely converted into campaign stages. The result is a political culture where noise overshadows substance and where the loudest insult often receives more attention than the most practical policy proposal.
What makes Migori’s case particularly sensitive is the county’s complex ethnic and clan composition. Migori is one of Kenya’s most cosmopolitan counties, bringing together Luo sub-clans, Kuria communities, Somalis, Luhyas and many others. In such an environment, careless rhetoric can easily inflame dormant tensions.
Political mobilisation based on clan entitlement and ethnic ownership risks fragmenting the fragile social cohesion that has allowed the county to coexist despite its diversity.
The repeated references to “Kimirwa,” “placenta politics,” ancestral legitimacy and clan superiority may sound humorous to supporters, but they dangerously reinforce exclusionary politics.
They subtly communicate that leadership belongs to certain bloodlines or communities while others remain outsiders regardless of competence or vision.
This is precisely the kind of politics Kenya has struggled to escape since independence.
Meanwhile, the ordinary residents of Migori continue grappling with serious challenges.
Roads remain impassable during rainy seasons. Youth unemployment is rampant. Public health facilities face chronic underfunding. Farmers struggle with unstable sugarcane prices and collapsing agricultural systems.
In many rural areas, access to clean water remains unreliable despite years of devolved funding.
Yet instead of sustained public discourse around healthcare, industrialisation, education, agriculture and job creation, political conversations are increasingly dominated by catchy slogans, clan arithmetic and funeral theatrics.
The greatest tragedy is that voters themselves are slowly becoming addicted to entertainment politics.
Crowds cheer insults louder than policy proposals. Social media rewards mockery more than governance audits.
Politicians have realised that comic ridicule travels faster than development statistics. As a result, many leaders now invest more energy in perfecting slogans than crafting solutions.
This trend poses a grave danger to democratic accountability. Once politics becomes pure entertainment, leaders stop fearing poor performance because public memory is constantly manipulated through emotional mobilisation and theatrical distractions.
Elections then cease to be referendums on service delivery and instead become tribal festivals driven by identity, resentment and political mythology.
Migori residents must, therefore, ask themselves difficult questions ahead of 2027. Are they electing comedians or administrators? Are funeral speeches more important than county budgets? Are political nicknames and insults feeding families or fixing roads? Is rhetoric replacing leadership?
Political competition is healthy in any democracy. In fact, strong opposition and vigorous debate are essential for accountability. However, competition must ultimately revolve around ideas and development outcomes rather than personal humiliation and ethnic symbolism.
Governor Ayacko has every right to defend his record and seek re-election. Nyamita and other challengers equally have a democratic right to question his leadership and offer alternatives. But both sides owe Migori residents something greater than political drama. They owe them dignity in public discourse and seriousness in leadership.
The people of Migori deserve politics that inspires hope rather than hostility. They deserve campaigns anchored on economic transformation, healthcare reform, agricultural revival, and youth empowerment. Most importantly, they deserve leaders who understand that political power is not a comedy competition but a public trust.
As 2027 approaches, Migori stands at a crossroads. It can either continue down the path of cadaver-and-pulpit politics where funerals become campaign rallies and insults become ideology, or it can reclaim issue-based politics grounded in accountability and development
History has shown that political lies eventually collapse under the weight of reality. Slogans may dominate headlines temporarily, but roads, hospitals, schools and livelihoods ultimately determine the quality of leadership.
The people of Migori must therefore resist becoming spectators in a political circus and instead demand substance over spectacle.
Democracy flourishes not when politicians shout the loudest, but when citizens ask the hardest questions.
In conclusion, political lies should have limits. Voters need services not insults, drama, comedy and sloganneering in churches and funerals.
2027 is approaching and I believe the evil wears new masks. Ayacko has been quite eclectic in his speeches, but his development credentials betray his eloquence both in Dholou and English as well as his mastery of Uncle Eddy’s song “Weka Mate Mlangoni, Nami Niteleze”.
Nyamita on his part is not a saint when it comes to the sloganeering. He is Ayacko’s equal. Having lost in 2013, retreated in 2017 to Uriri, Nyamita is not new to the gubernatorial politics.
In 2027, Nyamita must remember that no man walks twice between the thighs of a hippopotamus-the first pass is either luck or farewell.
The grandson of Sin Akuru Kuku Lubanga Ma Dognam, the famous Oyundi, will not step out of the eating table without a political fight.
Mr Dansam Ouma is a Political Scientist and Development Researcher
About the Author
